When Did the 21st Century Start?
On January 1, 2000, humankind celebrated the beginning of the new millennium—which was one year too early.
The 21st Century Started in 2001
In 1999, the world was preparing for the New Year's party of a lifetime. The year number in the Gregorian calendar was about to tick over to 2000, supposedly ushering in not only the 21st century but also the 3rd millennium AD.
However, the party was held one year too early—it should have been on January 1, 2001.
It all boils down to the question: was there a year 0? Let's first assume that year AD 0 existed. This would mean that:
- 1 full year would have passed at the end of year 0 since the beginning of the year count;
- 2 years would have passed at the end of year 1;
- and so on...
This means that 2000 years, two full millennia, would have passed at the end of year 1999. In other words, the 3rd millennium would have started on New Year's Day 2000.
The only problem with this theory is that year 0 did not exist, as historians, calendar experts, timeanddate.com, and other killjoys kept pointing out in the lead-up to the big party in year 2000.
In fact, neither the number zero, nor even the concept of nothingness, existed in 6th century Europe when a monk named Dionysius Exiguus came up with anno domini, the year numbering system (calendar era) we use today.
Dionysius, who lived in an area now part of Romania and Bulgaria, used Roman numerals to number the years “since the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ”, as he put it in his writings—and there is no Roman numeral for the number zero.
Year 1 BC Was Followed by Year AD 1
This means that year AD 1 directly followed year 1 BC, without the year count ever reaching zero. In other words, the first year of the anno domini era was year 1, not year 0. As a consequence,
- 1 full year had passed at the end of year 1;
- 2 years had passed at the end of year 2;
- and so on...
So, at the end of year 1999, as people were celebrating the new millennium, only 1999 full years had passed since the beginning of the calendar era—which is one year short of two full millennia.
Round Number Bias
Of course, the big fuss over the year 2000, or Y2K, was understandable from a psychological point of view. The human brain is predisposed to highlight “big numbers”—a tendency psychologists call the round number bias. It causes us to throw extra-glamorous parties on our 20th, 30th, or 40th birthdays and to celebrate milestones like the 1000th like on Facebook or the 100th victory of our favorite sports team.
So, in celebrating the beginning of the year 2000 as the event of a lifetime, we collectively succumbed to the appeal of the big, round year number—a classic case of round number bias.
What Did We Even Celebrate?
Even people celebrating the beginning of the new millennium on the correct date must contend with the fact that, in astronomical terms, there was nothing special about this particular event.
A year on Earth is defined as the time it takes Earth to complete an orbit around the Sun. This is called a solar or tropical year. Solar calendar systems, such as the western calendar, are designed to reflect that time span and the seasons it encompasses as precisely as possible, and they do so with varying levels of accuracy.
Year numbers, on the other hand, are just a means of counting our planet's revolutions. While this is undoubtedly a handy feature to describe and structure long time spans, the Earth's 1999th revolution around the Sun in the anno domini era is really no different than its 2000th revolution.
Only in Gregorian and Julian Calendars
In fact, looking at other calendar systems, it becomes clear how ambiguous year numbers are. For example, year 2001 marked the beginning of the 3rd millennium in the Gregorian calendar only. Other calendars, such as the Jewish calendar, the Islamic calendar, and the Hindu calendar, use completely different year numbers. So, while the Gregorian calendar is the system officially used around the world, this goes to show that our year count is nothing more than a random fabrication, which is ultimately based on the ideas and religious fervor of a 6th-century monk.
What's more, Dionysius Exiguus based the beginning of year AD 1 in the Julian calendar, the predecessor of today's calendar system, on a religious event—the birth of Jesus—which not only lacks astronomical relevance but is also based on religious lore and, as such, a rough estimation at best.
Create Calendar With Holidays
- Gregorian Calendar
- Julian Calendar
- Switch from Julian to Gregorian
- Roman Calendar
- What Do CE and BCE Mean?
- Did the Millennium Start in 2000 or 2001?
- Hindu Calendar
- Buddhist Calendar
- Islamic Calendar
- Jewish Calendar
- Persian Calendar
- Chinese Calendar
- Coptic Calendar
- Ethiopian Calendar
- Revised Julian Calendar
- Mayan Calendar